Advertisement
RRSFF vs YMZBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRSFF is a Hold and YMZBY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RRSFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYMZBY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RRSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- YMZBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
RRSFF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while YMZBY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +187.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
YMZBY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+0.36% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| RRSFF | YMZBY | RRSFF / YMZBY | |
| Capitalization | 133K | 4.45B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 102B | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 17.840 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 14.13 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 1.28T | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 173B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 102B | - |
YMZBY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RRSFF | YMZBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 15% | 2 days ago 10% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 2 days ago 9% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSVO | 22.91 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | |||
| EOCT | 30.72 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| Innovator Emerg Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF™-Oct | |||
| MYCI | 25.11 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| SPDR SSGA My2029 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| GAST | 32.72 | N/A | N/A |
| Gabelli Automation ETF | |||
| DNOV | 46.68 | -0.10 | -0.20% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Nov | |||
RRSFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RRSFF and SHGXY have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RRSFF and SHGXY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RRSFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRSFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHGXY - RRSFF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| YMZBY - RRSFF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JWLLF - RRSFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TUFBY - RRSFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OCGPF - RRSFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
YMZBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that YMZBY and WLMIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YMZBY and WLMIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YMZBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMZBY | 100% | N/A | ||
| WLMIF - YMZBY | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CELV - YMZBY | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.03% | ||
| RRSFF - YMZBY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NSLYF - YMZBY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JWLLF - YMZBY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||