Ad is loading...
RRMGX vs WFDAX
RRMGX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs WFDAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$86.66
Change-$0.17 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.88B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$25.57
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets956.8M
RRMGX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. WFDAX commentary
May 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a StrongBuy and WFDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.9B vs. WFDAX (957M). RRMGX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: RRMGX (23 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). RRMGX (1.29) and WFDAX (1.24) have similar cost to investors . WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). WFDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: WFDAX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). WFDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.07 vs. RRMGX (-9.09). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : 5.76 vs. WFDAX (-21.42).
| RRMGX | WFDAX | RRMGX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.21 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.24 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.433 | -0.428 | 335% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.9B | 957M | 2,915% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.09 | -3.07 | 296% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.31 | 27.91 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.76 | -21.42 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.20 | -25.52 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...