Ad is loading...
RRMGX vs WFDAX
RRMGX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs WFDAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$78.40
Change-$4.18 (-5.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$22.05
Change-$1.54 (-6.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets907.23M
RRMGX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. WFDAX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and WFDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDAX (907M). RRMGX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: RRMGX (23 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). RRMGX (1.29) and WFDAX (1.24) have similar cost to investors . WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). WFDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: WFDAX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.88 vs. WFDAX (-14.73). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : 26.99 vs. WFDAX (-6.80).
| RRMGX | WFDAX | RRMGX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.21 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.24 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.074 | -14.136 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 907M | 3,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.88 | -14.73 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.32 | -18.18 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.99 | -6.80 | -397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.80 | -34.22 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...