Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRMGX vs WFDAX
RRMGX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs WFDAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$89.50
Change+$0.08 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.37B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$26.88
Change-$0.12 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets954.85M
RRMGX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. WFDAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and WFDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDAX (955M). RRMGX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: RRMGX (23 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). RRMGX (1.29) and WFDAX (1.24) have similar cost to investors . WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). WFDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: WFDAX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). WFDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.90 vs. RRMGX (-5.56). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -4.14 vs. WFDAX (-29.71).
| RRMGX | WFDAX | RRMGX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.21 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.24 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.797 | 4.673 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 955M | 2,869% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.56 | 0.90 | -617% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.26 | 11.63 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.14 | -29.71 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.18 | -22.63 | -58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement