Ad is loading...
RRMGX vs WDSCX
RRMGX vs WDSCX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs WDSCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$78.40
Change-$4.18 (-5.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
Price$14.98
Change-$1.04 (-6.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets907.23M
RRMGX vs WDSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. WDSCX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and WDSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WDSCX (907M). RRMGX (0.00) and WDSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than WDSCX: RRMGX (23 years) vs WDSCX (18 years). WDSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). WDSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). WDSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: WDSCX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.88 vs. WDSCX (-18.68). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : 26.99 vs. WDSCX (-23.30).
| RRMGX | WDSCX | RRMGX / WDSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.96 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.99 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.074 | -14.302 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 907M | 3,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.88 | -18.68 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.32 | -23.57 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.99 | -23.30 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.80 | -51.94 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...