Ad is loading...
RRMGX vs WDSCX
RRMGX vs WDSCX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs WDSCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$86.66
Change-$0.17 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.88B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
Price$17.35
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets956.8M
RRMGX vs WDSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. WDSCX commentary
May 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a StrongBuy and WDSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.9B vs. WDSCX (957M). RRMGX (0.00) and WDSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than WDSCX: RRMGX (23 years) vs WDSCX (18 years). WDSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). WDSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). WDSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: WDSCX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). WDSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.61 vs. RRMGX (-9.09). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : 5.76 vs. WDSCX (-35.36).
| RRMGX | WDSCX | RRMGX / WDSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.96 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.99 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.433 | -0.744 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.9B | 957M | 2,915% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.09 | -7.61 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.31 | 19.41 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.76 | -35.36 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.20 | -45.59 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...