Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRMGX vs SPYGX
RRMGX vs SPYGX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs SPYGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$84.36
Change-$5.84 (-6.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
Spyglass Growth Institutional
Price$19.90
Change-$3.62 (-15.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
RRMGX vs SPYGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. SPYGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and SPYGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. SPYGX (1.02B). RRMGX (0.00) and SPYGX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than SPYGX: RRMGX (23 years) vs SPYGX (8 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than SPYGX (1.10). SPYGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPYGX: RRMGX (2500) vs SPYGX (100000). SPYGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.13 vs. RRMGX (-7.22). SPYGX return over 5 years is better than : -15.79 vs. RRMGX (-21.55).
| RRMGX | SPYGX | RRMGX / SPYGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.00 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.10 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.189 | -14.372 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 1.02B | 2,458% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.22 | -6.13 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.10 | 74.10 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.55 | -15.79 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.39 | N/A | - |