Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRMGX vs SMFYX
RRMGX vs SMFYX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs SMFYX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$90.25
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.9B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr Y
Price$42.97
Change+$0.26 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets732.7M
RRMGX vs SMFYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. SMFYX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Buy and SMFYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. SMFYX (733M). RRMGX (0.00) and SMFYX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than SMFYX: RRMGX (23 years) vs SMFYX (14 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than SMFYX (0.99). SMFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFYX: RRMGX (2500) vs SMFYX (100000). SMFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.42 vs. RRMGX (-12.69). SMFYX return over 5 years is better than : 20.48 vs. RRMGX (-14.13).
| RRMGX | SMFYX | RRMGX / SMFYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.96 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.775 | 12.840 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 733M | 3,533% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.69 | 2.42 | -524% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.74 | 41.05 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.13 | 20.48 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.13 | 119.19 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement