Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RRMGX vs SMFCX
RRMGX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RRMGX vs SMFCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$89.70
Change+$0.25 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.08B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$29.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets750.25M
RRMGX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRMGX vs. SMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRMGX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. SMFCX (750M). RRMGX (0.00) and SMFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RRMGX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: RRMGX (23 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). SMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: SMFCX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). SMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.02 vs. RRMGX (-9.04). SMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.90 vs. RRMGX (-9.37).
| RRMGX | SMFCX | RRMGX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.95 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.025 | 12.519 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.1B | 750M | 3,480% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.04 | 8.02 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.94 | 48.31 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.37 | 16.90 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.28 | 83.86 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers