RRGB
Price
$6.98
Change
+$0.24 (+3.56%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
125.01M
39 days until earnings call
YUM
Price
$152.70
Change
+$2.29 (+1.52%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
42.38B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RRGB vs YUM

Header iconRRGB vs YUM Comparison
Open Charts RRGB vs YUMBanner chart's image
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
Price$6.98
Change+$0.24 (+3.56%)
Volume$160.76K
Capitalization125.01M
Yum! Brands
Price$152.70
Change+$2.29 (+1.52%)
Volume$1.21M
Capitalization42.38B
RRGB vs YUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RRGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RRGB vs. YUM commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRGB is a StrongBuy and YUM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RRGB: $6.98 vs. YUM: $152.70)
Brand notoriety: RRGB: Not notable vs. YUM: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RRGB: 54% vs. YUM: 60%
Market capitalization -- RRGB: $125.01M vs. YUM: $42.38B
RRGB [@Restaurants] is valued at $125.01M. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $42.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RRGB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • RRGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the long-term than RRGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RRGB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RRGB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the short-term than RRGB.

Price Growth

RRGB (@Restaurants) experienced а +6.73% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was +4.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

RRGB is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.27% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUM($42.4B) has a higher market cap than RRGB($125M). RRGB YTD gains are higher at: 27.140 vs. YUM (15.476). YUM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.64B vs. RRGB (26.1M). YUM has more cash in the bank: 677M vs. RRGB (24.4M). RRGB has less debt than YUM: RRGB (523M) vs YUM (11.4B). YUM has higher revenues than RRGB: YUM (7.91B) vs RRGB (1.24B).
RRGBYUMRRGB / YUM
Capitalization125M42.4B0%
EBITDA26.1M2.64B1%
Gain YTD27.14015.476175%
P/E RatioN/A30.12-
Revenue1.24B7.91B16%
Total Cash24.4M677M4%
Total Debt523M11.4B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RRGB vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
RRGB
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7119
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10021
SMR RATING
1..100
10010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9626
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YUM's Valuation (52) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RRGB (83). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

RRGB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (54). This means that RRGB’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRGB (96). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than RRGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RRGBYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RRGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMNC0.10N/A
N/A
Amincor Inc
GPFOF2.78N/A
N/A
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V.
SLROF0.01N/A
N/A
Stellar Resources Ltd.
SRXXF9.90N/A
N/A
SPARX Asset Management Co., Ltd.
LABFF90.61N/A
N/A
LABORATORIOS FARMACEUTICOS ROVI SA

RRGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRGB has been loosely correlated with RICK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RRGB jumps, then RICK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRGB
1D Price
Change %
RRGB100%
+3.56%
RICK - RRGB
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
YUM - RRGB
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
LOCO - RRGB
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
WEN - RRGB
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
CBRL - RRGB
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.88%
More

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
+1.52%
MCD - YUM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
QSR - YUM
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
DPZ - YUM
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.08%
YUMC - YUM
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
WEN - YUM
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More