RRDMF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
25.15M
RUPRF
Price
$3.71
Change
-$0.01 (-0.27%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
879.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RRDMF vs RUPRF

Header iconRRDMF vs RUPRF Comparison
Open Charts RRDMF vs RUPRFBanner chart's image
Royal Road Minerals
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$321
Capitalization25.15M
Rupert Resources
Price$3.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
Volume$26.91K
Capitalization879.39M
RRDMF vs RUPRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RRDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RRDMF vs. RUPRF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRDMF is a Hold and RUPRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (RRDMF: $0.10 vs. RUPRF: $3.71)
Brand notoriety: RRDMF and RUPRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RRDMF: 1% vs. RUPRF: 92%
Market capitalization -- RRDMF: $25.15M vs. RUPRF: $879.39M
RRDMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $25.15M. RUPRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $879.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RRDMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUPRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RRDMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RUPRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RRDMF and RUPRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RRDMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUPRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RRDMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RUPRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RRDMF is a better buy in the short-term than RUPRF.

Price Growth

RRDMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.76% price change this week, while RUPRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUPRF($879M) has a higher market cap than RRDMF($25.1M). RUPRF YTD gains are higher at: 33.453 vs. RRDMF (0.000). RRDMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.2M vs. RUPRF (-6.85M). RUPRF has more cash in the bank: 85.8M vs. RRDMF (6.99M). RUPRF has less debt than RRDMF: RUPRF (0) vs RRDMF (34.8K). RRDMF (0) and RUPRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RRDMFRUPRFRRDMF / RUPRF
Capitalization25.1M879M3%
EBITDA-3.2M-6.85M47%
Gain YTD0.00033.453-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.99M85.8M8%
Total Debt34.8K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RRDMF vs RUPRF: Fundamental Ratings
RRDMF
RUPRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
9792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUPRF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as RRDMF (57). This means that RUPRF’s stock grew similarly to RRDMF’s over the last 12 months.

RUPRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as RRDMF (100). This means that RUPRF’s stock grew similarly to RRDMF’s over the last 12 months.

RUPRF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as RRDMF (97). This means that RUPRF’s stock grew similarly to RRDMF’s over the last 12 months.

RUPRF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as RRDMF (48). This means that RUPRF’s stock grew similarly to RRDMF’s over the last 12 months.

RRDMF's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as RUPRF (100). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to RUPRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RRDMFRUPRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RRDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEOHX17.880.15
+0.85%
Voya Large Cap Growth Port I
MLGRX8.670.03
+0.35%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class R3
DISIX23.280.06
+0.26%
BNY Mellon Small Cap Stock Index I
PEDGX13.18-0.01
-0.08%
Principal Edge MidCap Institutional
PASPX10.95-0.01
-0.09%
PACE Alternative Strategies P

RRDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RRDMF and PMCCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RRDMF and PMCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRDMF
1D Price
Change %
RRDMF100%
N/A
PMCCF - RRDMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
RUPRF - RRDMF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
RMLFF - RRDMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.02%
RMGGF - RRDMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMETF - RRDMF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+9.38%
More

RUPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RUPRF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUPRF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUPRF
1D Price
Change %
RUPRF100%
-0.28%
NSUPF - RUPRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
HCHDF - RUPRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
AUGG - RUPRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGLCF - RUPRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.31%
GPTRF - RUPRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
More