RRACF
Price
$13.55
Change
+$2.54 (+23.07%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
122.3M
TLGYF
Price
$13.02
Change
+$0.07 (+0.54%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
77.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RRACF vs TLGYF

Header iconRRACF vs TLGYF Comparison
Open Charts RRACF vs TLGYFBanner chart's image
Rigel Resource Acquisition
Price$13.55
Change+$2.54 (+23.07%)
Volume$300
Capitalization122.3M
TLGY Acquisition
Price$13.02
Change+$0.07 (+0.54%)
Volume$5.87K
Capitalization77.33M
RRACF vs TLGYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RRACF vs. TLGYF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRACF is a Hold and TLGYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (RRACF: $13.55 vs. TLGYF: $13.02)
Brand notoriety: RRACF and TLGYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RRACF: 86% vs. TLGYF: 65%
Market capitalization -- RRACF: $122.3M vs. TLGYF: $77.33M
RRACF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $122.3M. TLGYF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $77.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.03M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RRACF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLGYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RRACF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLGYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RRACF is a better buy in the long-term than TLGYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RRACF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLGYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RRACF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TLGYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RRACF is a better buy in the short-term than TLGYF.

Price Growth

RRACF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +23.07% price change this week, while TLGYF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -12.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.10% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRACF($122M) has a higher market cap than TLGYF($77.3M). TLGYF has higher P/E ratio than RRACF: TLGYF (76.67) vs RRACF (28.23). RRACF YTD gains are higher at: 17.826 vs. TLGYF (11.856). TLGYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -898K vs. RRACF (-6.75M). TLGYF has more cash in the bank: 208K vs. RRACF (62.7K). TLGYF has less debt than RRACF: TLGYF (4.87M) vs RRACF (14.3M). RRACF (0) and TLGYF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RRACFTLGYFRRACF / TLGYF
Capitalization122M77.3M158%
EBITDA-6.75M-898K752%
Gain YTD17.82611.856150%
P/E Ratio28.2376.6737%
Revenue00-
Total Cash62.7K208K30%
Total Debt14.3M4.87M293%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RRACFTLGYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
2%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
3%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
4%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
28%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCNNF7.580.33
+4.55%
Trulieve Cannabis Corporation
ATBHF0.04N/A
N/A
Aston Bay Holdings Ltd.
INGVF23.90N/A
N/A
ING Groep N.V.
MINBY18.65N/A
N/A
Minebea Mitsumi Inc.
SOMC24.99-0.01
-0.04%
Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc.

RRACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRACF has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RRACF jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRACF
1D Price
Change %
RRACF100%
N/A
HAIUF - RRACF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KVACU - RRACF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACIU - RRACF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALSUF - RRACF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FORL - RRACF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TLGYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLGYF has been loosely correlated with HYAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLGYF jumps, then HYAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLGYF
1D Price
Change %
TLGYF100%
+0.54%
HYAC - TLGYF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ILXP - TLGYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKU - TLGYF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRACF - TLGYF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAIAF - TLGYF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More