Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDSX
RPTIX vs WFDSX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$102.63
Change+$0.30 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.08B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst
Price$32.78
Change-$0.11 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets934.28M
RPTIX vs WFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDSX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. WFDSX (934M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDSX: RPTIX (0.05) vs WFDSX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDSX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDSX (19 years). WFDSX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). RPTIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDSX: RPTIX (500000) vs WFDSX (1000000). WFDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.47 vs. RPTIX (-7.30). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : -3.68 vs. WFDSX (-32.09).
| RPTIX | WFDSX | RPTIX / WFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.589 | 5.674 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.1B | 934M | 2,794% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.30 | -2.47 | 296% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.47 | 39.02 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.68 | -32.09 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.90 | -0.21 | -14,030% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement