Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDSX
RPTIX vs WFDSX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$97.47
Change-$5.71 (-5.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst
Price$29.08
Change-$4.24 (-12.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets888.31M
RPTIX vs WFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. WFDSX (888M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDSX: RPTIX (0.11) vs WFDSX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDSX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDSX (19 years). WFDSX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). RPTIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDSX: RPTIX (500000) vs WFDSX (1000000). RPTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.74 vs. WFDSX (-9.35). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : -16.18 vs. WFDSX (-48.07).
| RPTIX | WFDSX | RPTIX / WFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.123 | 1.821 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 888M | 2,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.74 | -9.35 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.30 | 10.24 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.18 | -48.07 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.29 | 14.90 | 351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement