Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDSX
RPTIX vs WFDSX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$102.77
Change+$0.92 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.63B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst
Price$32.95
Change+$0.30 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets933.51M
RPTIX vs WFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDSX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 26.6B vs. WFDSX (934M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDSX: RPTIX (0.05) vs WFDSX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDSX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDSX (19 years). WFDSX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). RPTIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDSX: RPTIX (500000) vs WFDSX (1000000). WFDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.33 vs. RPTIX (-6.50). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.79 vs. WFDSX (-24.25).
| RPTIX | WFDSX | RPTIX / WFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.89 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.729 | 6.222 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.6B | 934M | 2,848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.50 | -0.33 | 1,954% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.58 | 42.15 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.79 | -24.25 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.03 | 5.41 | 703% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement