Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$99.04
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$30.04
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets911.15M
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. WFDRX (911M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.05) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDRX (13 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). RPTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.89 vs. WFDRX (-6.96). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : -12.51 vs. WFDRX (-45.42).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.020 | -4.904 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 911M | 2,810% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.89 | -6.96 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.59 | 25.83 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.51 | -45.42 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.77 | -0.33 | -10,789% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement