Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$102.77
Change+$0.92 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.86B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$33.61
Change+$0.31 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets941.36M
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Buy and WFDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 26.9B vs. WFDRX (941M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.05) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. RPTIX (-6.50). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.79 vs. WFDRX (-23.44).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.729 | 6.327 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9B | 941M | 2,859% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.50 | -0.09 | 7,290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.58 | 42.84 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.79 | -23.44 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.03 | 7.38 | 515% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement