Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$97.47
Change-$5.71 (-5.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$29.76
Change-$4.22 (-12.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets888.31M
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. WFDRX (888M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.11) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDRX (13 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). RPTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.74 vs. WFDRX (-8.96). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : -16.18 vs. WFDRX (-47.37).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.123 | 1.848 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 888M | 2,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.74 | -8.96 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.30 | 11.04 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.18 | -47.37 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.29 | 17.40 | 301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement