Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDDX
RPTIX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$97.47
Change-$5.71 (-5.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$25.45
Change-$4.26 (-14.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets888.31M
RPTIX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDDX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. WFDDX (888M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: RPTIX (0.11) vs WFDDX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDDX (21 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). RPTIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: RPTIX (500000) vs WFDDX (1000000). RPTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.74 vs. WFDDX (-11.20). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : -16.18 vs. WFDDX (-51.31).
| RPTIX | WFDDX | RPTIX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.123 | 1.800 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 888M | 2,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.74 | -11.20 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.30 | 6.53 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.18 | -51.31 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.29 | 3.71 | 1,410% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement