Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs WSMRX
RPMGX vs WSMRX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs WSMRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$98.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$28.24
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
RPMGX vs WSMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. WSMRX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and WSMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. WSMRX (1.31B). RPMGX (0.00) and WSMRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than WSMRX: RPMGX (34 years) vs WSMRX (7 years). WSMRX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). WSMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSMRX: RPMGX (2500) vs WSMRX (1000000). WSMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.53 vs. RPMGX (-3.01). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -12.90 vs. WSMRX (-20.70).
| RPMGX | WSMRX | RPMGX / WSMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.98 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.043 | 0.320 | -326% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 1.31B | 1,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.01 | -1.53 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.62 | 9.29 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.90 | -20.70 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement