Ad is loading...
RPMGX vs WFDDX
RPMGX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.33
Change+$0.38 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.58B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.88
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
RPMGX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. WFDDX commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Buy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.6B vs. WFDDX (1.07B). RPMGX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: RPMGX (0.05) vs WFDDX (0.00). RPMGX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: RPMGX (33 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RPMGX (21.70). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: RPMGX (2500) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.54 vs. RPMGX (3.80). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 3.66 vs. WFDDX (-15.82).
| RPMGX | WFDDX | RPMGX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.226 | 4.076 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.6B | 1.07B | 2,865% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 15.54 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.26 | -1.87 | 335% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.66 | -15.82 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.71 | -8.27 | -456% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...