Ad is loading...
RPMGX vs WFDDX
RPMGX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$89.05
Change-$4.76 (-5.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$23.80
Change-$1.66 (-6.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets907.23M
RPMGX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. WFDDX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDDX (907M). RPMGX (0.00) and WFDDX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: RPMGX (33 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: RPMGX (2500) vs WFDDX (1000000). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.38 vs. WFDDX (-14.17). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.25 vs. WFDDX (-3.76).
| RPMGX | WFDDX | RPMGX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.14 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.17 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.936 | -14.141 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 907M | 3,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.38 | -14.17 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.32 | -17.42 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.25 | -3.76 | -911% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.26 | -30.53 | -53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...