Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs WFDDX
RPMGX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.91
Change+$0.52 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.99B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.60
Change+$0.43 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets958.06M
RPMGX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. WFDDX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Buy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. WFDDX (958M). RPMGX (0.00) and WFDDX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: RPMGX (33 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: RPMGX (2500) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. RPMGX (-0.99). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 6.06 vs. WFDDX (-23.41).
| RPMGX | WFDDX | RPMGX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.14 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.17 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.189 | 3.175 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 958M | 2,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.99 | 2.55 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.86 | 27.51 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.06 | -23.41 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.02 | -18.91 | -143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement