Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs WFDDX
RPMGX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.04
Change+$0.43 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.48
Change+$0.27 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets965.18M
RPMGX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. WFDDX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a StrongBuy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. WFDDX (965M). RPMGX (0.00) and WFDDX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: RPMGX (33 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: RPMGX (2500) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.93 vs. RPMGX (-1.27). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 8.22 vs. WFDDX (-22.14).
| RPMGX | WFDDX | RPMGX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.14 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.17 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.316 | 2.742 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 965M | 2,902% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.27 | 2.93 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.51 | 33.27 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.22 | -22.14 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.56 | -18.91 | -135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement