Ad is loading...
RPMGX vs WFDAX
RPMGX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs WFDAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$89.05
Change-$4.76 (-5.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$22.05
Change-$1.54 (-6.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets907.23M
RPMGX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. WFDAX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and WFDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDAX (907M). RPMGX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: RPMGX (33 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). WFDAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). WFDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: WFDAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.38 vs. WFDAX (-14.73). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.25 vs. WFDAX (-6.80).
| RPMGX | WFDAX | RPMGX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.21 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.24 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.936 | -14.136 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 907M | 3,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.38 | -14.73 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.32 | -18.18 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.25 | -6.80 | -503% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.26 | -34.22 | -48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...