Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs WFDAX
RPMGX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs WFDAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$103.21
Change+$0.33 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.36B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$27.66
Change+$0.34 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets972.14M
RPMGX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. WFDAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Buy and WFDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDAX (972M). RPMGX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: RPMGX (33 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). WFDAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). WFDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: WFDAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). WFDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. RPMGX (-2.48). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 3.03 vs. WFDAX (-27.03).
| RPMGX | WFDAX | RPMGX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.21 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.24 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.489 | 8.255 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 972M | 2,819% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.48 | 6.35 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.45 | 30.64 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.03 | -27.03 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.98 | -15.42 | -194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement