Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs WDSCX
RPMGX vs WDSCX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs WDSCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.91
Change+$0.52 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.99B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
Price$17.95
Change+$0.26 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets958.06M
RPMGX vs WDSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. WDSCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Buy and WDSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. WDSCX (958M). RPMGX (0.00) and WDSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than WDSCX: RPMGX (33 years) vs WDSCX (18 years). WDSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). WDSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). WDSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: WDSCX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.99 vs. WDSCX (-2.92). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 6.06 vs. WDSCX (-38.97).
| RPMGX | WDSCX | RPMGX / WDSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.99 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.189 | 2.689 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 958M | 2,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.99 | -2.92 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.86 | 18.01 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.06 | -38.97 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.02 | -43.91 | -62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement