Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs SMFYX
RPMGX vs SMFYX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SMFYX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.19
Change+$0.29 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.08B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr Y
Price$42.92
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets750.25M
RPMGX vs SMFYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SMFYX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and SMFYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. SMFYX (750M). RPMGX (0.00) and SMFYX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than SMFYX: RPMGX (33 years) vs SMFYX (14 years). SMFYX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). SMFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFYX: RPMGX (2500) vs SMFYX (100000). SMFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.82 vs. RPMGX (-7.46). SMFYX return over 5 years is better than : 29.16 vs. RPMGX (-4.20).
| RPMGX | SMFYX | RPMGX / SMFYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.96 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.99 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.467 | 13.395 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.1B | 750M | 3,480% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.46 | 10.82 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.94 | 56.81 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.20 | 29.16 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.78 | 126.74 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement