Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs SMFCX
RPMGX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SMFCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$97.11
Change-$5.64 (-5.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$20.81
Change-$9.48 (-31.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets672.25M
RPMGX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. SMFCX (672M). RPMGX (0.00) and SMFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: RPMGX (34 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). SMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: SMFCX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.89 vs. SMFCX (-24.46). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -16.66 vs. SMFCX (-28.76).
| RPMGX | SMFCX | RPMGX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.134 | -0.526 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 672M | 3,735% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.89 | -24.46 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.15 | -5.71 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.66 | -28.76 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.88 | 60.70 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement