Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs SMFAX
RPMGX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SMFAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$101.58
Change-$1.38 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.86B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$33.41
Change-$0.82 (-2.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets726.98M
RPMGX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SMFAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. SMFAX (727M). RPMGX (0.00) and SMFAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: RPMGX (33 years) vs SMFAX (14 years). SMFAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). RPMGX (2500) and SMFAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.26 vs. RPMGX (-8.85). SMFAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.25 vs. RPMGX (-6.56).
| RPMGX | SMFAX | RPMGX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.21 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.39 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.239 | 13.532 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 727M | 3,563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.85 | 5.26 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.95 | 41.33 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.56 | 22.25 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.35 | 109.88 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement