Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs RSGFX
RPMGX vs RSGFX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs RSGFX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$97.11
Change-$5.64 (-5.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
Victory RS Select Growth C
Price$10.29
Change-$2.00 (-16.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.56M
RPMGX vs RSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. RSGFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and RSGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. RSGFX (83.6M). RPMGX (0.00) and RSGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than RSGFX: RPMGX (34 years) vs RSGFX (18 years). RSGFX (3.68) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). RSGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). RPMGX (2500) and RSGFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.89 vs. RSGFX (-16.55). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -16.66 vs. RSGFX (-66.32).
| RPMGX | RSGFX | RPMGX / RSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 2.18 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 3.68 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.134 | 4.573 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 83.6M | 30,024% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.89 | -16.55 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.15 | 13.08 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.66 | -66.32 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.88 | -70.02 | -73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement