RPKIF
Price
$23.17
Change
-$0.75 (-3.14%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
256.12M
SUMXF
Price
$3.12
Change
-$0.09 (-2.80%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
78.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RPKIF vs SUMXF

Header iconRPKIF vs SUMXF Comparison
Open Charts RPKIF vs SUMXFBanner chart's image
Richards Packaging Income Fund
Price$23.17
Change-$0.75 (-3.14%)
Volume$101
Capitalization256.12M
Supremex
Price$3.12
Change-$0.09 (-2.80%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization78.34M
RPKIF vs SUMXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RPKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RPKIF vs. SUMXF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPKIF is a Hold and SUMXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RPKIF: $23.17 vs. SUMXF: $3.12)
Brand notoriety: RPKIF and SUMXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RPKIF: 20% vs. SUMXF: 183%
Market capitalization -- RPKIF: $256.12M vs. SUMXF: $78.34M
RPKIF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $256.12M. SUMXF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $78.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RPKIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSUMXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RPKIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SUMXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUMXF is a better buy in the long-term than RPKIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RPKIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUMXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RPKIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SUMXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RPKIF is a better buy in the short-term than SUMXF.

Price Growth

RPKIF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUMXF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -2.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-0.33% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPKIF($256M) has a higher market cap than SUMXF($78.3M). RPKIF has higher P/E ratio than SUMXF: RPKIF (14.59) vs SUMXF (9.22). SUMXF YTD gains are higher at: 21.245 vs. RPKIF (9.095). RPKIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 55.1M vs. SUMXF (10.5M). RPKIF has more cash in the bank: 2.64M vs. SUMXF (2.06M). SUMXF has less debt than RPKIF: SUMXF (81.6M) vs RPKIF (102M). RPKIF has higher revenues than SUMXF: RPKIF (413M) vs SUMXF (275M).
RPKIFSUMXFRPKIF / SUMXF
Capitalization256M78.3M327%
EBITDA55.1M10.5M525%
Gain YTD9.09521.24543%
P/E Ratio14.599.22158%
Revenue413M275M150%
Total Cash2.64M2.06M128%
Total Debt102M81.6M125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RPKIF vs SUMXF: Fundamental Ratings
RPKIF
SUMXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9833
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
6295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1516
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUMXF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as RPKIF (18). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew similarly to RPKIF’s over the last 12 months.

SUMXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RPKIF (100). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RPKIF’s over the last 12 months.

RPKIF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUMXF (95). This means that RPKIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

SUMXF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as RPKIF (55). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew similarly to RPKIF’s over the last 12 months.

RPKIF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMXF (16). This means that RPKIF’s stock grew similarly to SUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RPKIFSUMXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RPKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MITSF25.430.87
+3.54%
Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
HLFFF8.75N/A
N/A
Hellofresh SE
SKHRF0.62N/A
N/A
Stakeholder Gold Corp.
RSNUF0.03N/A
N/A
RENASCOR RES LTD.
YOKEY59.00-0.05
-0.08%
Yokogawa Electric Co.

RPKIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RPKIF and TCLAF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RPKIF and TCLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RPKIF
1D Price
Change %
RPKIF100%
N/A
TCLAF - RPKIF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNHFF - RPKIF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WIPKF - RPKIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNGSF - RPKIF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUMXF - RPKIF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
More

SUMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUMXF and WIPKF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUMXF and WIPKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUMXF
1D Price
Change %
SUMXF100%
-2.93%
WIPKF - SUMXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCLAF - SUMXF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - SUMXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
VKSC - SUMXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPKIF - SUMXF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More