Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs SFSLX
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SFSLX
RPFGX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SFSLX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and SFSLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. SFSLX (122M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: RPFGX (1.35) vs SFSLX (0.00). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: RPFGX (34 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.74 vs. SFSLX (3.75). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 114.72 vs. SFSLX (34.37).
| RPFGX | SFSLX | RPFGX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.19 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.523 | 3.909 | 423% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 122M | 934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.74 | 3.75 | 714% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.10 | 4.97 | 1,349% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.72 | 34.37 | 334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.32 | 41.10 | 234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement