Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs SBFAX
RPFGX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs SBFAX
RPFGX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. SBFAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and SBFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. SBFAX (122M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: RPFGX (1.35) vs SBFAX (0.64). RPFGX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: RPFGX (34 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). SBFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). SBFAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). RPFGX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.74 vs. SBFAX (5.78). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 114.72 vs. SBFAX (42.83).
| RPFGX | SBFAX | RPFGX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.523 | 4.378 | 377% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 122M | 934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.64 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.74 | 5.78 | 463% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.10 | 9.04 | 742% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.72 | 42.83 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.32 | 56.30 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement