Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs RYKCX
RPFGX vs RYKCX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYKCX
RPFGX vs RYKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYKCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and RYKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. RYKCX (8.4M). RYKCX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYKCX (4.12) vs RPFGX (1.35). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYKCX: RPFGX (34 years) vs RYKCX (24 years). RYKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RYKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKCX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYKCX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.80 vs. RYKCX (23.56). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 104.95 vs. RYKCX (87.80).
| RPFGX | RYKCX | RPFGX / RYKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.41 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.43 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.834 | 9.835 | 161% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 8.4M | 13,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 4.12 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.80 | 23.56 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.72 | 21.55 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.95 | 87.80 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.45 | 75.06 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement