Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs RYKCX
RPFGX vs RYKCX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYKCX
RPFGX vs RYKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYKCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and RYKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. RYKCX (10.5M). RYKCX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYKCX (3.86) vs RPFGX (1.29). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYKCX: RPFGX (34 years) vs RYKCX (24 years). RYKCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RYKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKCX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYKCX (2500). RPFGX (24.90) and RYKCX (24.27) have marching annual gain over last year. RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.48 vs. RYKCX (97.97).
| RPFGX | RYKCX | RPFGX / RYKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.39 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.44 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.434 | 14.819 | 124% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 10.5M | 11,057% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 3.86 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.90 | 24.27 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.54 | 41.55 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.48 | 97.97 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.13 | 97.67 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement