Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs RYBKX
RPFGX vs RYBKX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYBKX
RPFGX vs RYBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYBKX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and RYBKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. RYBKX (9.07M). RYBKX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYBKX (3.48) vs RPFGX (1.35). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYBKX: RPFGX (34 years) vs RYBKX (21 years). RYBKX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RYBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (5%) and RYBKX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBKX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYBKX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.74 vs. RYBKX (20.51). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 114.72 vs. RYBKX (106.44).
| RPFGX | RYBKX | RPFGX / RYBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.65 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.69 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.523 | 11.685 | 141% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 9.07M | 12,556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 3.48 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.74 | 20.51 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.10 | 39.34 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.72 | 106.44 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.32 | 90.52 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement