Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs RYBKX
RPFGX vs RYBKX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYBKX
RPFGX vs RYBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYBKX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and RYBKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. RYBKX (8.4M). RYBKX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYBKX (3.43) vs RPFGX (1.35). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYBKX: RPFGX (34 years) vs RYBKX (21 years). RYBKX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RYBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (5%) and RYBKX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBKX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYBKX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.80 vs. RYBKX (24.51). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 104.95 vs. RYBKX (94.95).
| RPFGX | RYBKX | RPFGX / RYBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.65 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.69 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.834 | 10.337 | 153% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 8.4M | 13,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 3.43 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.80 | 24.51 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.72 | 24.32 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.95 | 94.95 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.45 | 88.97 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement