Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs RYBKX
RPFGX vs RYBKX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYBKX
RPFGX vs RYBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYBKX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Hold and RYBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. RYBKX (10.5M). RYBKX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYBKX (3.22) vs RPFGX (1.29). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYBKX: RPFGX (34 years) vs RYBKX (21 years). RYBKX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RYBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (5%) and RYBKX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBKX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYBKX (2500). RPFGX (25.47) and RYBKX (25.14) have marching annual gain over last year. RYBKX (134.15) and RPFGX (133.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RPFGX | RYBKX | RPFGX / RYBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.64 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.69 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.893 | 16.674 | 125% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 10.5M | 11,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 3.22 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.47 | 25.14 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.88 | 53.92 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 133.66 | 134.15 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.64 | 123.93 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement