ROMA
Price
$2.62
Change
+$0.10 (+3.97%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
156.06M
SBC
Price
$4.44
Change
+$0.04 (+0.91%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
453.96M
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ROMA vs SBC

Header iconROMA vs SBC Comparison
Open Charts ROMA vs SBCBanner chart's image
Roma Green Finance
Price$2.62
Change+$0.10 (+3.97%)
Volume$11.77K
Capitalization156.06M
SBC Medical Group Holdings
Price$4.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.91%)
Volume$43.46K
Capitalization453.96M
ROMA vs SBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ROMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ROMA vs. SBC commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ROMA is a Hold and SBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (ROMA: $2.62 vs. SBC: $4.44)
Brand notoriety: ROMA and SBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Data Processing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ROMA: 6% vs. SBC: 36%
Market capitalization -- ROMA: $156.06M vs. SBC: $453.96M
ROMA [@Data Processing Services] is valued at $156.06M. SBC’s [@Data Processing Services] market capitalization is $453.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $46.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $6.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ROMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ROMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBC is a better buy in the long-term than ROMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ROMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ROMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ROMA is a better buy in the short-term than SBC.

Price Growth

ROMA (@Data Processing Services) experienced а -20.36% price change this week, while SBC (@Data Processing Services) price change was +2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Data Processing Services (-1.23% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBC($454M) has a higher market cap than ROMA($156M). ROMA YTD gains are higher at: 235.897 vs. SBC (-20.144).
ROMASBCROMA / SBC
Capitalization156M454M34%
EBITDAN/A81.1M-
Gain YTD235.897-20.144-1,171%
P/E RatioN/A9.28-
RevenueN/A198M-
Total CashN/A132M-
Total DebtN/A14.1M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ROMASBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ROMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THOAX44.920.10
+0.22%
Thornburg Global Opportunities A
IMCGX11.21-0.03
-0.27%
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth I
BDAIX32.05-0.09
-0.28%
Baron Durable Advantage Institutional
AXMIX15.41-0.07
-0.45%
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style I
VSORX44.78-0.22
-0.49%
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp R6

ROMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ROMA and QSG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ROMA and QSG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROMA
1D Price
Change %
ROMA100%
+3.97%
QSG - ROMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
RELX - ROMA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
EDTK - ROMA
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
AFYA - ROMA
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
TAL - ROMA
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
More

SBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBC and INTJ have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBC and INTJ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBC
1D Price
Change %
SBC100%
+0.91%
INTJ - SBC
3%
Poorly correlated
-30.35%
AERT - SBC
2%
Poorly correlated
-14.43%
ROMA - SBC
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
VCIG - SBC
-7%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
RGP - SBC
-9%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%