It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ROCK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUPNRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ROCK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ROCK (@Building Products) experienced а -0.33% price change this week, while UPNRF (@Building Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.54%.
ROCK is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
ROCK | UPNRF | ROCK / UPNRF | |
Capitalization | 2.45B | 2.31B | 106% |
EBITDA | 179M | 134M | 134% |
Gain YTD | -8.825 | -5.244 | 168% |
P/E Ratio | 22.23 | 24.57 | 90% |
Revenue | 1.38B | 1.29B | 107% |
Total Cash | 99.4M | 121M | 82% |
Total Debt | 46.3M | 141M | 33% |
ROCK | UPNRF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UPNRF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ROCK (72) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that UPNRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ROCK’s over the last 12 months.
UPNRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ROCK (61) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that UPNRF’s stock grew similarly to ROCK’s over the last 12 months.
UPNRF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as ROCK (65) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that UPNRF’s stock grew similarly to ROCK’s over the last 12 months.
ROCK's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as UPNRF (70) in the null industry. This means that ROCK’s stock grew similarly to UPNRF’s over the last 12 months.
UPNRF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ROCK (77) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that UPNRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ROCK’s over the last 12 months.
ROCK | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROCK has been loosely correlated with GMS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ROCK jumps, then GMS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ROCK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ROCK | 100% | -0.48% | ||
GMS - ROCK | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
BLDR - ROCK | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
CARR - ROCK | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
TREX - ROCK | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.56% | ||
AZEK - ROCK | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPNRF has been loosely correlated with CSTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPNRF jumps, then CSTE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPNRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UPNRF | 100% | N/A | ||
CSTE - UPNRF | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
BLDR - UPNRF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
MAS - UPNRF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
NX - UPNRF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
ROCK - UPNRF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
More |