Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs ZEMIX
RNWHX vs ZEMIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs ZEMIX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
American Beacon Ninety One Emr Mkts EqR5
Price$13.82
Change-$0.40 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.83M
RNWHX vs ZEMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. ZEMIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and ZEMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. ZEMIX (282M). ZEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: ZEMIX (1.69) vs RNWHX (1.25). RNWHX was incepted earlier than ZEMIX: RNWHX (10 years) vs ZEMIX (7 years). ZEMIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ZEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs ZEMIX (250000). ZEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.85 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. ZEMIX (7.26).
| RNWHX | ZEMIX | RNWHX / ZEMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.86 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.12 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.092 | 11.183 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 282M | 26,773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.69 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.68 | 30.85 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.24 | 50.52 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | 7.26 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers