Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs ZEMAX
RNWHX vs ZEMAX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs ZEMAX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.82
Change+$0.19 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9B
American Beacon Ninety One Emr Mkts Eq Y
Price$13.63
Change+$0.18 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.7M
RNWHX vs ZEMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. ZEMAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and ZEMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 71.9B vs. ZEMAX (218M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ZEMAX: RNWHX (0.97) vs ZEMAX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than ZEMAX: RNWHX (10 years) vs ZEMAX (7 years). ZEMAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. ZEMAX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs ZEMAX (100000). ZEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.50 vs. RNWHX (15.26). ZEMAX (26.81) and RNWHX (26.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RNWHX | ZEMAX | RNWHX / ZEMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.92 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.05 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.021 | 22.682 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.9B | 218M | 32,982% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.26 | 27.50 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.34 | 49.48 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.08 | 26.81 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers