Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WIFMX
RNWHX vs WIFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WIFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Instl
Price$3.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.21M
RNWHX vs WIFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WIFMX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WIFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. WIFMX (30.2M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WIFMX: RNWHX (1.25) vs WIFMX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WIFMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WIFMX (10 years). WIFMX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). WIFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WIFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WIFMX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.68 vs. WIFMX (6.28). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. WIFMX (-3.41).
| RNWHX | WIFMX | RNWHX / WIFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.00 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.56 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.092 | 5.707 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 30.2M | 250,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.68 | 6.28 | 441% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.24 | 38.70 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | -3.41 | -343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.21 | 52.32 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement