Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WBELX
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WBELX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
William Blair Emerging Mkts Ldrs I
Price$12.48
Change+$0.79 (+6.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.49M
RNWHX vs WBELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WBELX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WBELX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. WBELX (103M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WBELX: RNWHX (1.25) vs WBELX (0.83). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WBELX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WBELX (18 years). WBELX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). WBELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBELX: RNWHX (250) vs WBELX (500000). WBELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.59 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. WBELX (-11.34).
| RNWHX | WBELX | RNWHX / WBELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.092 | 7.679 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 103M | 73,301% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.83 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.68 | 36.59 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.24 | 42.20 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | -11.34 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.21 | 84.03 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers