Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$90.03
Change+$0.20 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.82
Change+$0.02 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.45M
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAFMX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. WAFMX (35.5M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWHX (1.00) vs WAFMX (0.71). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.05 vs. WAFMX (8.39). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.55 vs. RNWHX (27.62).
| RNWHX | WAFMX | RNWHX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.429 | 10.725 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.4B | 35.5M | 201,127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.71 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.05 | 8.39 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.70 | 34.07 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.62 | 30.55 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement