Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.22
Change-$1.24 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.61
Change-$0.04 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.5M
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAFMX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. WAFMX (33.5M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWHX (0.90) vs WAFMX (0.70). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.99 vs. WAFMX (1.56). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 24.39 vs. WAFMX (7.70).
| RNWHX | WAFMX | RNWHX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.572 | 5.797 | 458% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.6B | 33.5M | 228,657% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.70 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.99 | 1.56 | 1,342% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.72 | 44.75 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.39 | 7.70 | 317% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement