Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.64B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.28M
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAFMX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.6B vs. WAFMX (34.3M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWHX (0.93) vs WAFMX (0.70). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. WAFMX (1.27). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.08 vs. WAFMX (19.05).
| RNWHX | WAFMX | RNWHX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.375 | 8.116 | 300% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.6B | 34.3M | 217,493% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.70 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.38 | 1.27 | 1,210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.29 | 54.62 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.08 | 19.05 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement