Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$91.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.91M
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAFMX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. WAFMX (29.9M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWHX (0.91) vs WAFMX (0.72). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.96 vs. WAFMX (4.32). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.37 vs. WAFMX (-3.56).
| RNWHX | WAFMX | RNWHX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.889 | 4.928 | 424% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 29.9M | 251,839% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.72 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.96 | 4.32 | 439% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.08 | 47.03 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.37 | -3.56 | -319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.22 | 36.09 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement