Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs WAFMX
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$84.97
Change-$1.04 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.56B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.76
Change-$0.04 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.53M
RNWHX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. WAFMX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 68.6B vs. WAFMX (37.5M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWHX (1.04) vs WAFMX (0.70). RNWHX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs WAFMX (13 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (29.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWHX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). WAFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.05 vs. RNWHX (8.20). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.35 vs. RNWHX (33.47).
| RNWHX | WAFMX | RNWHX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.773 | 8.986 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.6B | 37.5M | 182,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.70 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 12.05 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.09 | 46.23 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.47 | 41.35 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers