Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TSMGX
RNWHX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.02
Change-$0.41 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$16.00
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
RNWHX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TSMGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and TSMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. TSMGX (1.91B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: RNWHX (0.99) vs TSMGX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: RNWHX (10 years) vs TSMGX (7 years). TSMGX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSMGX (21.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSMGX: RNWHX (250) vs TSMGX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.04 vs. TSMGX (14.20). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.58 vs. TSMGX (-0.02).
| RNWHX | TSMGX | RNWHX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.44 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.101 | 13.556 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8B | 1.91B | 3,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.04 | 14.20 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.30 | 22.04 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.58 | -0.02 | -168,156% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement