Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TSMGX
RNWHX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$92.86
Change-$0.35 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.85B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$16.78
Change-$0.17 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
RNWHX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TSMGX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and TSMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 73.9B vs. TSMGX (2.07B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: RNWHX (0.97) vs TSMGX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: RNWHX (10 years) vs TSMGX (7 years). TSMGX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSMGX (21.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSMGX: RNWHX (250) vs TSMGX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.81 vs. TSMGX (6.14). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.26 vs. TSMGX (-3.23).
| RNWHX | TSMGX | RNWHX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.44 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.59 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.152 | 19.092 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.9B | 2.07B | 3,579% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.81 | 6.14 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.94 | 36.87 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.26 | -3.23 | -1,029% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement