Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TSMGX
RNWHX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$84.97
Change-$1.04 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.56B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$15.63
Change-$0.23 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
RNWHX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TSMGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and TSMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 68.6B vs. TSMGX (1.95B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: RNWHX (1.04) vs TSMGX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: RNWHX (10 years) vs TSMGX (7 years). TSMGX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSMGX (17.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSMGX: RNWHX (250) vs TSMGX (2500). TSMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. RNWHX (8.20). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.47 vs. TSMGX (9.82).
| RNWHX | TSMGX | RNWHX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.44 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.773 | 10.930 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.6B | 1.95B | 3,514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 9.45 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.09 | 21.16 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.47 | 9.82 | 341% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers