Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TSEMX
RNWHX vs TSEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TSEMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$92.86
Change-$0.35 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.57B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr Y
Price$17.04
Change-$0.16 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
RNWHX vs TSEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TSEMX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and TSEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 73.6B vs. TSEMX (2.07B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than TSEMX: RNWHX (0.97) vs TSEMX (0.10). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TSEMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs TSEMX (11 years). TSEMX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSEMX (21.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSEMX: RNWHX (250) vs TSEMX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.81 vs. TSEMX (6.49). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.26 vs. TSEMX (-1.70).
| RNWHX | TSEMX | RNWHX / TSEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.16 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.16 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.152 | 19.411 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.6B | 2.07B | 3,564% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.10 | 956% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.81 | 6.49 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.94 | 38.24 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.26 | -1.70 | -1,961% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement