Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TEMRX
RNWHX vs TEMRX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TEMRX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.26
Change+$0.16 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq A
Price$10.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.71B
RNWHX vs TEMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TEMRX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and TEMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. TEMRX (1.71B). TEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: TEMRX (1.68) vs RNWHX (0.91). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TEMRX: RNWHX (10 years) vs TEMRX (15 years). TEMRX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). TEMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEMRX: RNWHX (250) vs TEMRX (2500). TEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.41 vs. RNWHX (20.02). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.77 vs. TEMRX (-22.59).
| RNWHX | TEMRX | RNWHX / TEMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.30 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.862 | 31.830 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 1.71B | 4,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.68 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.02 | 27.41 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.48 | 45.88 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.77 | -22.59 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.48 | 28.14 | 332% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers