Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TEMRX
RNWHX vs TEMRX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TEMRX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.01
Change+$0.20 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq A
Price$10.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.73B
RNWHX vs TEMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TEMRX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and TEMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. TEMRX (1.73B). TEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: TEMRX (1.68) vs RNWHX (0.91). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TEMRX: RNWHX (10 years) vs TEMRX (15 years). TEMRX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). TEMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEMRX: RNWHX (250) vs TEMRX (2500). TEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.83 vs. RNWHX (19.66). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.11 vs. TEMRX (-16.16).
| RNWHX | TEMRX | RNWHX / TEMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.30 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.348 | 33.763 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 1.73B | 4,350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.68 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.66 | 27.83 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.33 | 50.05 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.11 | -16.16 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.80 | 37.33 | 278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement