Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TEGCX
RNWHX vs TEGCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TEGCX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.02
Change-$0.41 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
Price$15.33
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
RNWHX vs TEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TEGCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and TEGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. TEGCX (1.91B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than TEGCX: RNWHX (0.99) vs TEGCX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TEGCX: RNWHX (10 years) vs TEGCX (7 years). TEGCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TEGCX (21.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEGCX: RNWHX (250) vs TEGCX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.04 vs. TEGCX (13.30). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.58 vs. TEGCX (-3.68).
| RNWHX | TEGCX | RNWHX / TEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.14 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.55 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.101 | 13.137 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8B | 1.91B | 3,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.04 | 13.30 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.30 | 19.30 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.58 | -3.68 | -804% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers