Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs TEGCX
RNWHX vs TEGCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs TEGCX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.56
Change+$0.54 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
Price$15.44
Change+$0.08 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
RNWHX vs TEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. TEGCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and TEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. TEGCX (1.93B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than TEGCX: RNWHX (0.99) vs TEGCX (0.00). RNWHX was incepted earlier than TEGCX: RNWHX (10 years) vs TEGCX (7 years). TEGCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TEGCX (17.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEGCX: RNWHX (250) vs TEGCX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. TEGCX (9.74). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.51 vs. TEGCX (0.51).
| RNWHX | TEGCX | RNWHX / TEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.14 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.55 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.496 | 13.948 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.6B | 1.93B | 3,650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 9.74 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.00 | 20.16 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.51 | 0.51 | 6,384% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers