Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFVLX
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFVLX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
Price$18.79
Change+$2.07 (+12.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.88M
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFVLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SFVLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. SFVLX (148M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFVLX (3.16) vs RNWHX (1.25). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SFVLX (10 years). SFVLX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWHX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). SFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.66 vs. RNWHX (27.68). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 76.90 vs. RNWHX (11.69).
| RNWHX | SFVLX | RNWHX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.19 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.092 | 11.183 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 148M | 51,014% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 3.16 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.68 | 49.66 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.24 | 54.40 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | 76.90 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers