Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFVLX
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFVLX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.10
Change+$0.42 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.17B
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
Price$17.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.21M
RNWHX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFVLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SFVLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. SFVLX (133M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFVLX (2.88) vs RNWHX (0.91). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SFVLX (10 years). SFVLX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWHX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). SFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.61 vs. RNWHX (20.02). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 65.28 vs. RNWHX (18.77).
| RNWHX | SFVLX | RNWHX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.15 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.19 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.862 | 35.012 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.2B | 133M | 56,541% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 2.88 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.02 | 30.61 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.48 | 48.90 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.77 | 65.28 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers