Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFGIX
RNWHX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFGIX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.22
Change-$1.24 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
Seafarer Overseas Gr and Income Investor
Price$14.61
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.17B
RNWHX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFGIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SFGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. SFGIX (3.17B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFGIX (2.27) vs RNWHX (0.90). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SFGIX (14 years). SFGIX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFGIX (16.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWHX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.46 vs. RNWHX (20.99). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 24.39 vs. SFGIX (21.57).
| RNWHX | SFGIX | RNWHX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.97 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.97 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.572 | 28.516 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.6B | 3.17B | 2,414% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 2.27 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.99 | 24.46 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.72 | 34.30 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.39 | 21.57 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers