Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SFGIX
RNWHX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SFGIX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.08
Change-$0.45 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Seafarer Overseas Gr and Income Investor
Price$16.35
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.46B
RNWHX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SFGIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SFGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. SFGIX (3.46B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SFGIX (2.81) vs RNWHX (1.25). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SFGIX (14 years). SFGIX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFGIX (16.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWHX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.55 vs. RNWHX (27.68). SFGIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.95 vs. RNWHX (11.69).
| RNWHX | SFGIX | RNWHX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.97 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.97 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.092 | 10.976 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 3.46B | 2,180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 2.81 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.68 | 44.55 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.24 | 47.82 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | 20.95 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.21 | 102.78 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers