Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SEQFX
RNWHX vs SEQFX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SEQFX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.22
Change-$1.24 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
SEI Emerging Markets Equity Y (SIT)
Price$14.50
Change-$0.11 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
RNWHX vs SEQFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SEQFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SEQFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. SEQFX (1.6B). SEQFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SEQFX (2.61) vs RNWHX (0.90). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SEQFX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SEQFX (11 years). SEQFX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SEQFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEQFX: RNWHX (250) vs SEQFX (100000). SEQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.76 vs. RNWHX (20.99). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 24.39 vs. SEQFX (21.37).
| RNWHX | SEQFX | RNWHX / SEQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.01 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.18 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.572 | 34.903 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.6B | 1.6B | 4,782% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 2.61 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.99 | 31.76 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.72 | 58.39 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.39 | 21.37 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement