Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SBHEX
RNWHX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SBHEX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Retl
Price$11.54
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.56M
RNWHX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SBHEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. SBHEX (84.6M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SBHEX (5.16) vs RNWHX (0.93). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SBHEX (11 years). SBHEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWHX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.76 vs. RNWHX (15.38). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 71.38 vs. RNWHX (29.08).
| RNWHX | SBHEX | RNWHX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.14 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.21 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.375 | 28.939 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.7B | 84.6M | 88,298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 5.16 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.38 | 22.76 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.29 | 92.88 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.08 | 71.38 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 117.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement