Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SBHEX
RNWHX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SBHEX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.10
Change+$0.42 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.17B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Retl
Price$11.75
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.37M
RNWHX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SBHEX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SBHEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. SBHEX (85.4M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SBHEX (5.04) vs RNWHX (0.91). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SBHEX (11 years). SBHEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWHX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.04 vs. RNWHX (20.02). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.25 vs. RNWHX (18.77).
| RNWHX | SBHEX | RNWHX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.14 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.21 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.862 | 30.391 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.2B | 85.4M | 88,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 5.04 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.02 | 29.04 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.48 | 75.95 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.77 | 59.25 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.48 | 133.97 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers