Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SBHEX
RNWHX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SBHEX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Retl
Price$12.90
Change+$1.33 (+11.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.95M
RNWHX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SBHEX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. SBHEX (94.9M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SBHEX (2.44) vs RNWHX (1.25). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SBHEX (12 years). SBHEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWHX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.50 vs. RNWHX (27.68). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.44 vs. RNWHX (11.69).
| RNWHX | SBHEX | RNWHX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.14 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.21 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.092 | 9.694 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 94.9M | 79,557% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 2.44 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.68 | 46.50 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.24 | 89.19 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | 63.44 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.21 | 194.85 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement