Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SBHEX
RNWHX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SBHEX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.22
Change-$1.24 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Retl
Price$11.82
Change-$0.11 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.13M
RNWHX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SBHEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and SBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. SBHEX (87.1M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SBHEX (4.99) vs RNWHX (0.90). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SBHEX (11 years). SBHEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWHX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.33 vs. RNWHX (21.58). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 70.77 vs. RNWHX (26.00).
| RNWHX | SBHEX | RNWHX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.14 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 2.21 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.203 | 33.296 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.6B | 87.1M | 87,945% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 4.99 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.58 | 32.33 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.07 | 87.10 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.00 | 70.77 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 139.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement