Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs SBEMX
RNWHX vs SBEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs SBEMX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Instl
Price$12.95
Change+$1.33 (+11.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.95M
RNWHX vs SBEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. SBEMX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Hold and SBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. SBEMX (94.9M). SBEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: SBEMX (2.53) vs RNWHX (1.25). RNWHX was incepted earlier than SBEMX: RNWHX (10 years) vs SBEMX (15 years). SBEMX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). SBEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBEMX: RNWHX (250) vs SBEMX (250000). SBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.72 vs. RNWHX (27.68). SBEMX return over 5 years is better than : 64.65 vs. RNWHX (11.69).
| RNWHX | SBEMX | RNWHX / SBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.82 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.092 | 9.653 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 94.9M | 79,557% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 2.53 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.68 | 46.72 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.24 | 90.10 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | 64.65 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.21 | 200.71 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement