Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs RSENX
RNWHX vs RSENX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs RSENX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$84.97
Change-$1.04 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74B
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets Y
Price$22.09
Change-$0.30 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.1M
RNWHX vs RSENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. RSENX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and RSENX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. RSENX (199M). RSENX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: RSENX (2.18) vs RNWHX (1.04). RNWHX was incepted earlier than RSENX: RNWHX (10 years) vs RSENX (16 years). RSENX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RSENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSENX: RNWHX (250) vs RSENX (1000000). RSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.52 vs. RNWHX (8.20). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.47 vs. RSENX (30.04).
| RNWHX | RSENX | RNWHX / RSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.36 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.773 | 14.873 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.7B | 199M | 34,020% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 2.18 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 12.52 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.09 | 25.55 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.47 | 30.04 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers