Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WAFMX
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5
Price$92.38
Change+$0.37 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.82
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.31M
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.9B vs. WAFMX (35.3M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWFX (1.01) vs WAFMX (0.69). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWFX (23 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWFX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.51 vs. WAFMX (6.88). WAFMX (28.39) and RNWFX (28.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RNWFX | WAFMX | RNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.20 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.570 | 10.725 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.9B | 35.3M | 203,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 0.69 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.51 | 6.88 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 42.51 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.08 | 28.39 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.93 | 38.47 | 244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement