Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WAFMX
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.86
Change-$1.27 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.61
Change-$0.04 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.5M
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. WAFMX (33.5M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWFX (0.95) vs WAFMX (0.70). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWFX (24 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWFX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. WAFMX (1.56). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.64 vs. WAFMX (7.70).
| RNWFX | WAFMX | RNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.20 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.307 | 5.797 | 488% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.6B | 33.5M | 228,657% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.70 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.74 | 1.56 | 1,391% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.49 | 44.75 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.64 | 7.70 | 346% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.29 | 33.26 | 311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement