Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WAFMX
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5
Price$91.55
Change+$0.20 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.82
Change+$0.02 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.45M
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. WAFMX (35.5M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWFX (1.04) vs WAFMX (0.71). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWFX (23 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWFX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. WAFMX (8.39). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.55 vs. RNWFX (28.26).
| RNWFX | WAFMX | RNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.20 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.496 | 10.725 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.4B | 35.5M | 201,127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.71 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 8.39 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.07 | 34.07 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.26 | 30.55 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.61 | 33.24 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement