Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WAFMX
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.52
Change-$0.42 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.80
Change-$0.02 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.74M
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. WAFMX (36.7M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWFX (1.04) vs WAFMX (0.68). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWFX (23 years) vs WAFMX (13 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWFX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. WAFMX (13.92). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 33.00 vs. RNWFX (30.24).
| RNWFX | WAFMX | RNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.20 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.163 | 10.145 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8B | 36.7M | 192,916% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.68 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.21 | 13.92 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.68 | 53.11 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.24 | 33.00 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.70 | 29.87 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement