Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs WAFMX
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R5
Price$99.24
Change+$2.53 (+2.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.21M
RNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Hold and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. WAFMX (30.2M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWFX (1.31) vs WAFMX (0.00). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWFX (24 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). WAFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWFX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.90 vs. WAFMX (6.13). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.39 vs. WAFMX (-4.75).
| RNWFX | WAFMX | RNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.20 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.094 | 5.833 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 30.2M | 250,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.90 | 6.13 | 455% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.85 | 38.05 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.39 | -4.75 | -261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.30 | 48.74 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement