RNWEF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 9 closing price
Capitalization
45.26M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCIA
Price
$5.76
Change
+$0.11 (+1.95%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
26.37M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RNWEF vs SCIA

Header iconRNWEF vs SCIA Comparison
Open Charts RNWEF vs SCIABanner chart's image
REC SILICON ASA
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization45.26M
SCI Engineered Materials
Price$5.76
Change+$0.11 (+1.95%)
Volume$2.47K
Capitalization26.37M
RNWEF vs SCIA Comparison Chart in %
RNWEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCIA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RNWEF vs. SCIA commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWEF is a Hold and SCIA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (RNWEF: $0.08 vs. SCIA: $5.76)
Brand notoriety: RNWEF and SCIA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RNWEF: 209% vs. SCIA: 30%
Market capitalization -- RNWEF: $45.26M vs. SCIA: $26.37M
RNWEF [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $45.26M. SCIA’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $26.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $489.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $39.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RNWEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCIA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RNWEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCIA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCIA is a better buy in the long-term than RNWEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RNWEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCIA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RNWEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SCIA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RNWEF is a better buy in the short-term than SCIA.

Price Growth

RNWEF (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCIA (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +4.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +7.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+7.69% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEF($45.3M) has a higher market cap than SCIA($26.4M). SCIA has higher P/E ratio than RNWEF: SCIA (16.46) vs RNWEF (15.40). SCIA YTD gains are higher at: 8.068 vs. RNWEF (0.000). RNWEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 179M vs. SCIA (2.12M). RNWEF has more cash in the bank: 10M vs. SCIA (9.48M). SCIA has less debt than RNWEF: SCIA (1.11M) vs RNWEF (50.9M). RNWEF has higher revenues than SCIA: RNWEF (87.8M) vs SCIA (17.4M).
RNWEFSCIARNWEF / SCIA
Capitalization45.3M26.4M172%
EBITDA179M2.12M8,455%
Gain YTD0.0008.068-
P/E Ratio15.4016.4694%
Revenue87.8M17.4M505%
Total Cash10M9.48M106%
Total Debt50.9M1.11M4,590%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNWEF vs SCIA: Fundamental Ratings
RNWEF
SCIA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8536
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10033
SMR RATING
1..100
10063
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5120
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCIA's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as RNWEF (61). This means that SCIA’s stock grew similarly to RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

SCIA's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RNWEF (100). This means that SCIA’s stock grew significantly faster than RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

SCIA's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNWEF (100). This means that SCIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

SCIA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNWEF (90). This means that SCIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

SCIA's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as RNWEF (51). This means that SCIA’s stock grew similarly to RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RNWEFSCIA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RNWEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCIA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KPEA0.060.02
+60.00%
Kun Peng International Ltd.
EKTAY6.550.13
+1.95%
Elekta AB
TZROP2.85N/A
N/A
Tzero Group Inc.
KLPEF38.46N/A
N/A
Klepierre SA
FFBB84.68-0.52
-0.61%
FFB Bancorp

RNWEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNWEF has been loosely correlated with RNWEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RNWEF jumps, then RNWEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNWEF
1D Price
Change %
RNWEF100%
N/A
RNWEY - RNWEF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TXN - RNWEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
NVTS - RNWEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.19%
ADI - RNWEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
IFNNY - RNWEF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
More

SCIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCIA and INTC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCIA and INTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCIA
1D Price
Change %
SCIA100%
+1.95%
INTC - SCIA
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
NVEC - SCIA
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
RNWEF - SCIA
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROHCF - SCIA
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SILXF - SCIA
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
More