Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WIFMX
RNWBX vs WIFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WIFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.33
Change-$1.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Instl
Price$3.68
Change-$0.05 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.1M
RNWBX vs WIFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WIFMX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and WIFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. WIFMX (32.1M). WIFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: WIFMX (0.87) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WIFMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs WIFMX (10 years). WIFMX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WIFMX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WIFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WIFMX (100000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.74 vs. WIFMX (0.90). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.82 vs. WIFMX (7.66).
| RNWBX | WIFMX | RNWBX / WIFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.56 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.534 | 4.545 | 562% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.6B | 32.1M | 238,629% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.87 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.74 | 0.90 | 2,184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.78 | 45.05 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.82 | 7.66 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers