Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WIFMX
RNWBX vs WIFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WIFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Instl
Price$3.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.21M
RNWBX vs WIFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WIFMX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and WIFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. WIFMX (30.2M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than WIFMX: RNWBX (0.45) vs WIFMX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WIFMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs WIFMX (10 years). WIFMX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). WIFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WIFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WIFMX (100000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.27 vs. WIFMX (6.28). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. WIFMX (-3.41).
| RNWBX | WIFMX | RNWBX / WIFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.00 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.56 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.996 | 5.707 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 30.2M | 250,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.27 | 6.28 | 418% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.81 | 38.70 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.03 | -3.41 | -206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.19 | 52.32 | 218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement