Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WBENX
RNWBX vs WBENX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WBENX
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
William Blair Emerging Mkts Growth N
Price$17.20
Change+$1.73 (+11.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
RNWBX vs WBENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WBENX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and WBENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. WBENX (1.12B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than WBENX: RNWBX (0.45) vs WBENX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WBENX: RNWBX (24 years) vs WBENX (21 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than WBENX (1.43). WBENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBENX: RNWBX (250) vs WBENX (2500). WBENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.12 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. WBENX (-14.94).
| RNWBX | WBENX | RNWBX / WBENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.24 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.43 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.996 | 10.115 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 1.12B | 6,735% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.13 | 356% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.27 | 42.12 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.81 | 57.63 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.03 | -14.94 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.19 | 77.34 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement