Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.67
Change-$0.40 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.80
Change-$0.02 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.74M
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAFMX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. WAFMX (36.7M). WAFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: WAFMX (0.68) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs WAFMX (13 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.84 vs. WAFMX (13.92). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 33.00 vs. RNWBX (24.82).
| RNWBX | WAFMX | RNWBX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.20 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.479 | 10.145 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8B | 36.7M | 192,916% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.68 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.84 | 13.92 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.52 | 53.11 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.82 | 33.00 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.54 | 29.87 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement