Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$87.32
Change+$0.35 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.82
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.31M
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAFMX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.9B vs. WAFMX (35.3M). WAFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: WAFMX (0.69) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.13 vs. WAFMX (6.88). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.39 vs. RNWBX (22.76).
| RNWBX | WAFMX | RNWBX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.20 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.722 | 10.725 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.9B | 35.3M | 203,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.69 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.13 | 6.88 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.56 | 42.51 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.76 | 28.39 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.93 | 38.47 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement