Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.33
Change-$1.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.61
Change-$0.04 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.5M
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAFMX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. WAFMX (33.5M). WAFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: WAFMX (0.70) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.32 vs. WAFMX (1.56). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.37 vs. WAFMX (7.70).
| RNWBX | WAFMX | RNWBX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.20 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.152 | 5.797 | 468% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.6B | 33.5M | 228,657% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.70 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.32 | 1.56 | 1,299% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.10 | 44.75 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.37 | 7.70 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.86 | 33.26 | 282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement