Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.82
Change+$0.02 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.45M
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAFMX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. WAFMX (35.5M). WAFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: WAFMX (0.71) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. WAFMX (8.39). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.55 vs. RNWBX (22.93).
| RNWBX | WAFMX | RNWBX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.20 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.729 | 10.725 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.4B | 35.5M | 201,127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.71 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.87 | 8.39 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 34.07 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.93 | 30.55 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.17 | 33.24 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement