Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs UMEMX
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs UMEMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst
Price$16.44
Change+$0.16 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets750.55M
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. UMEMX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and UMEMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. UMEMX (751M). UMEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: UMEMX (1.01) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than UMEMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs UMEMX (28 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than UMEMX (1.29). UMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMEMX: RNWBX (250) vs UMEMX (2000). UMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.96 vs. RNWBX (19.18). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. UMEMX (-7.59).
| RNWBX | UMEMX | RNWBX / UMEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.29 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.884 | 24.829 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 751M | 10,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.01 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.18 | 22.96 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.02 | 43.50 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.90 | -7.59 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.81 | 86.36 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers