Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TSMGX
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.17
Change+$0.40 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.17B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$16.89
Change+$0.09 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TSMGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and TSMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. TSMGX (2.05B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: RNWBX (0.12) vs TSMGX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: RNWBX (24 years) vs TSMGX (7 years). RNWBX (1.67) and TSMGX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSMGX (21.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSMGX: RNWBX (250) vs TSMGX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.78 vs. TSMGX (14.44). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.40 vs. TSMGX (-17.13).
| RNWBX | TSMGX | RNWBX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.44 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.59 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.772 | 19.233 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.2B | 2.05B | 3,675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.78 | 14.44 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.66 | 29.53 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | -17.13 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement