Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TSMGX
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$17.85
Change+$0.74 (+4.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TSMGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and TSMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. TSMGX (2.14B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: RNWBX (0.45) vs TSMGX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: RNWBX (24 years) vs TSMGX (7 years). RNWBX (1.66) and TSMGX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. TSMGX (21.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSMGX: RNWBX (250) vs TSMGX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.27 vs. TSMGX (22.68). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. TSMGX (-23.23).
| RNWBX | TSMGX | RNWBX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.44 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.59 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.996 | 5.621 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 2.14B | 3,526% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.27 | 22.68 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.81 | 31.93 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.03 | -23.23 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement