Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TEGCX
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TEGCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.86
Change-$1.00 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.56B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
Price$14.99
Change-$0.22 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TEGCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and TEGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 68.6B vs. TEGCX (1.95B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TEGCX: RNWBX (0.13) vs TEGCX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TEGCX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TEGCX (7 years). TEGCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TEGCX (17.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEGCX: RNWBX (250) vs TEGCX (2500). TEGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. RNWBX (7.09). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.56 vs. TEGCX (5.83).
| RNWBX | TEGCX | RNWBX / TEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.14 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.55 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.298 | 10.627 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.6B | 1.95B | 3,514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.09 | 8.62 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.44 | 18.40 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.56 | 5.83 | 490% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement