Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TEGCX
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TEGCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
Price$16.14
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TEGCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and TEGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. TEGCX (2.07B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TEGCX: RNWBX (0.12) vs TEGCX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TEGCX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TEGCX (7 years). TEGCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TEGCX (21.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEGCX: RNWBX (250) vs TEGCX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. TEGCX (9.57). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.32 vs. TEGCX (-12.98).
| RNWBX | TEGCX | RNWBX / TEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.14 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.52 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.440 | 19.114 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.7B | 2.07B | 3,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 9.57 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.19 | 38.42 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.32 | -12.98 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement