Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TEGCX
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TEGCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
Price$15.44
Change+$0.08 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TEGCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and TEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. TEGCX (1.93B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TEGCX: RNWBX (0.13) vs TEGCX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TEGCX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TEGCX (7 years). TEGCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TEGCX (17.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEGCX: RNWBX (250) vs TEGCX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. TEGCX (9.74). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.64 vs. TEGCX (0.51).
| RNWBX | TEGCX | RNWBX / TEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.14 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.55 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.935 | 13.948 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.6B | 1.93B | 3,650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.50 | 9.74 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.23 | 20.16 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.64 | 0.51 | 5,426% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers